Monday, May 6, 2013

Don’t Judge An Artist By His Paintings



Intended Publication: Harper's

The morning I met David Elhart, I overslept.
While digging through my closet, I called to tell him I was running late. “Oh, don’t worry about it, Paula. You sound just like our granddaughter- she’s always staying up late and reading. Well, we’re sitting in the middle here, so when you come inside, just look confused and we’ll flag you down.”
Frantic with the realization that I had no clean clothes, I didn’t think to ask David who the “we” was.
I settled on a dress that smelled like the restaurant where I had worn it last. I thought it was too short to be considered professional, but funky enough to wear when meeting an artist. 
Artists like funky clothes, right?
Well, David would, I assumed. With the bold colors and loud shapes of his paintings, I figured he was all about funky.
I had some sense of his political views, too. During our first phone call, he warned, “Just don’t get me started on George Bush, ok?”
As I ran inside Water Street, the place I had first seen David’s artwork, I realized I didn’t know who I was supposed to be looking for. I must have looked confused enough though because I was immediately flagged down.
The “we” was David and Rose, a married couple in their late sixties. David was dressed in a tee shirt, jeans, and a baseball cap. His full beard and glasses reminded me of my own grandpa. Rose has short curly hair and a kind, open face. She wore a bright blue windbreaker with a button of her granddaughter’s track picture right next to her heart. 
Despite my lateness, they still asked if I wanted anything to eat before we got started. After politely rejecting their offer, we decided to move to a more quiet space in the other room. We situated ourselves in a row, sitting in three leather armchairs. The back room featured a different artist’s work, which David admired. He said, “Whoever painted these is good. Just look at those glasses!”
I sat facing David. He angled himself slightly forward, while Rose sat far away enough to look over both of us. I began by asking when David first became interested in art.
He says, “ Before I got a real job, before I got married...45 years ago.”
“46”, Rose says, correcting David, “46 years ago.”  
 Rose was a reliable source for all the details David didn’t remember.
“When’d we move here?” David asks.
Rose pauses from texting her granddaughter to answer, “October of ’77.”
With her ability to retain dates, it makes sense Rose is in charge of the administrative part of David’s art. When joking about her what her job entails, she says, “I keep him in line”.
David and Rose first lived in Milwaukee, where David received his Associate’s Degree from Milwaukee Technical College and his Bachelor’s Degree from the University of Wisconsin. They moved to Iowa in ’74—thanks to the G.I. Bill, David could simultaneously work and study at the University of Iowa.
“I worked in the research field for 40 years. I’ve been painting since I retired 3 years ago.”
“4”, Rose says without looking up from texting, “It’s been 4 years.”
Rose apologizes for being on her phone. Their family is going through a hard time right now—their son is getting a divorce, and him and his daughter are staying at their house. Even with the distraction, however, she doesn’t miss a beat when David or I ask her questions.
She tells me, “He doesn’t stop painting.”
After working in pharmacological research for 40 years, David has his own studio in their basement. Yet, as he explained earlier, his interest in art is an old one. He had taken a few art classes at the University of Iowa and received training at the Layton School of Art in Milwaukee. Before securing a research job, he did government contract work and illustrated engine parts. His art had to wait out of necessity, however. It was a pragmatic decision that came down to having to pay the bills. “I needed to eat, and being an artist wasn’t going to get it.”
Rose chimes in, “We had a baby.”
David doesn’t want to talk about his work in research, but he shares that he was an animal welfare specialist, and he taught and wrote for twenty years.
“You did a great job teaching,” Rose says. “Didn’t Steve just thank you the other day at breakfast?”
“He sure did. That was very nice of him.”
Through his work, David got to travel to Japan in 1991 for one month, and took Rose with him when he went again in 2001 and 2006. He mainly went to learn the methods they use in their research. He describes Japan as “one large extended family. They’re very community oriented.”
Although both David and Rose speak fondly of Japan, they would never move there because all their family is in Michigan. David says, “Japan is so clean...the people are so courteous.” Rose reminds David of the time they got lost, and a man walked them the two miles back to their hotel. “I can only speak a little Japanese, but we had the card with the name of the hotel on it,” David explains.
David also talks about the Hiroshima Peace Park. He describes two theatres that “show footage you would never see in this country.” David is consistent and honest with his political views. Yet, although they are an important part of him, he only subtly incorporates them in his paintings. “I don’t set out to be political. I set out to create another place. Unless you read the titles, you might not even know.” For example, his painting, titled “To Joe From Harry”, is about the message Harry Truman wanted to send Joseph Stalin with the bombing of Hiroshima. David says, “The message was to the Russians about who was going to be in charge of the world after the Second World War.” Admittedly, when David’s artwork initially caught my eye, I hadn’t noticed the political undertones of his paintings.
In continuing to talk about his art, he repeats the theme that it’s not from a deep, philosophical message. He says the endpoint is to have fun. “I kind of paint blindly”—he explains that nothing about his art is pre-planned, and it’s more of a sum of his thoughts.
Without me bringing it up, he also speaks about his age, “People who don’t know me anticipate a younger person.” It’s true—when I first saw David’s paintings, I pictured the artist as young and hip: apparently my mind can't wrap itself around an older man creating vivid pop art that pays homage to the likes of Andy Warhol and Jackson Pollock. I comment on David’s distinct style and he agrees, “I think it’s different—different enough to be something new. I’m creating something nice while supposedly breaking rules—like you’re not supposed to use a ruler.”
David’s work is an intriguing balance of technical art and the fine arts—he attributes the mix to his past work, which involved him being very precise. He thinks his technicality adds to the story telling capability of his artwork. David’s favorite types of stories to tell are about things that reflect memory. He asks me if I know of a very old and deserted paper mill in Vicksburg. With a sense of awe in his voice, he describes staring at the building and wanting to ask it, “Please, tell me what went on here...even though the building can’t talk. The older [the building] the better.”
Or on a trip to Ellis Island, he became wrapped up in the emotional experiences preserved in the location. He speaks quickly as he thinks about the memories it holds. He sees the memories as alive and still going on because they’re “trapped in the walls of the building”. His face lights up during his recollection like a little kid who just discovered a secret shortcut.
Rose senses that David is getting caught up in his reminiscence and reminds him to tell me about his work in Saugatuck. “Right, right” he says, “I work down there at the Artist Collective. I hang paintings. There are about 25 artists who work there, and pay rent so they have a space to do their work.” Because it’s hard to get that type of thing organized, he’s only been able to volunteer once. But now that the ball is rolling, he plans on getting more involved.
I sense that David is done talking about himself so I put my notebook away. He begins to give me advice on my future travels because I had told him I was interested in joining the Peace Corps at the beginning of the interview. He warns me that Americans love themselves to death and love to talk. In a lowered voice he says, “When they go abroad Americans needs to learn to shut the fuck up.”
“Oh, David. I’m sorry about that Paula,” Rose says.
I giggle upon hearing David cuss and assure both of them it’s fine and that I agree. I promise David I won’t be that obnoxious American when I travel.
He repeats himself about Americans loving to talk too much and Rose jokes, “Yeah, exactly like what you’re doing right now. Let’s go honey.”
David and Rose walk out of Water Street together, holding hands, and I hear Rose tell David about the text messages she had been receiving. I wait to see them get into their car before I finally order myself a coffee. As I stood in line, I look at David’s paintings and try to picture him creating them. At that moment, something David had said about his art stood out in my mind, “I enjoy doing what I’m doing so much because I’m discovering.”
I sit down with my cup of coffee and take one last look at his art before I immerse myself in my book. The paintings all seem to be speaking to me in David’s voice, and I smile to myself, knowing exactly what he was talking about.



6 comments:

  1. Paula—
    I love your lead. So clever and fun and totally characterizes you and David before the story even gets going.
    Rose is so great. But I think I like Rose more? Which isn’t necessarily a bad thing if that’s okay with you. I feel like I see her and know her more throughout the piece. I love that you went where the interview went and didn’t contain the piece to just David’s art. I think you were right in making it about the relationship between David and Rose and how they communicate. But I would have liked a little more description of what his work looks like, what mediums he uses, are they acrylic or oil paints? I’ve seen them (the oakwood location, right?) and they’re pretty whacky and fun. Or maybe even inserting an image of one of the paintings would be good.
    Also, they're like the cutest ever. You made me want to meet them, for sure.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I thought that you did a great job of involving yourself in this piece. You also did a great job of capturing the flow of dialogue that occurred between yourself, David and Rose. It's not an easy thing to do, but I thought you balanced it well. I'd agree with that Darrin that seeing him painting in action would be really interesting and add an extra layer of depth to the piece. You describe his unique and methodical painting style, so seeing that in action would be very interesting. I really enjoyed this piece, as David is a really interesting guy, and you made me interested in him! Great job!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I sense that David is done talking about himself so I put my notebook away. He begins to give me advice on my future travels because I had told him I was interested in joining the Peace Corps at the beginning of the interview. He warns me that Americans love themselves to death and love to talk. In a lowered voice he says, “When they go abroad Americans needs to learn to shut the fuck up.”

    I wanted to see how you knew he was done talking about himself. I have had that feeling with my Grandfather many times--especially when he is talking about the war. He diverts to my Grandmother--much like how Rose was was David's ever present companion--and how I should be paying attention to her, or ask her about when the moved, or when he went to Germany. It is those subtle little shifts that actually tell a lot of about the person. And I thought it was great that you picked up on the subject change, and Rose's check of him, but I wanted to know what he was doing that made you think that--unless it was just conversation.

    Also, gimme more Rose.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I love how you portray the interplay between David and Rose. I think that it could potentially use a little more dialogue if you have it, but I also think that what you have is still pretty damn good by itself. It has a lot of personality to it, and I think that the way you bounce between dialogue and explanation sort-of mimics the sort of character that you wished to portray David as. I definitely want to see some of his art now.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I really like your beginning. It immediately provides characterization of David while also introducing the "I." You did a great job of setting the scene and I loved the descriptions we got about the couple. Rose correcting him on the details and dates is hilarious. The classic old married couple. I agree with some of the others that capturing him while painting could add to the piece. I'm not sure where you would insert it to break your storyline up though. Great job overall!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Paula,

    I loved your opening. Your initial interaction with David on the phone immediately reveals his kind nature which you do a good job in highlighting throughout the piece. I also agree with Hannah in that I felt like I got a better sense of Rose than David throughout the piece. Because the profile is about David I think that there's more you can do to highlight him. More descriptions about his art work would definitely help readers to get a better sense of him as an artists and an individual. What makes David's work unique? You get in to it a little bit -- "David’s work is an intriguing balance of technical art and the fine arts.." -- but I think you could do more.

    In your process writing post you talk about how you were playing around with the idea to include more of his political views. You touch on the fact that some of his pieces turn out to embody political undertones, so maybe you could expand on that a little more. Overall, I think it’s a good first draft. Nice work!

    ReplyDelete